外语教学与研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6): 868-879.

• 外语教育(教育部哲学社会科学学报名栏) • 上一篇    下一篇

我国大学英语课堂同伴协商互动实证研究

徐锦芬 舒静   

  1. 华中科技大学(徐), 华中科技大学/中南民族大学(舒)
  • 出版日期:2020-11-20 发布日期:2020-12-15
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社科基金重点项目“教育生态视角下我国大学生英语学习多元互动研究”(20AYY015)的阶段性成果。

An empirical study of negotiated interaction in college English classroom group work in China

XU Jinfen & SHU Jing   

  1. School of Foreign Languages, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
  • Online:2020-11-20 Published:2020-12-15

摘要: 本研究以同伴协商互动为核心,从大学英语课堂同伴互动口语语料库随机抽取79个话题讨论任务的小组互动口语语料,借鉴Varonis & Gass(1985)的意义协商发生模型,分析同伴互动中各类协商互动的分布特点及发生过程。结果发现:外语学习者在小组互动中主要进行内容协商,推动话题发展,也有一定量的意义协商和形式协商以解决互动中的交际障碍和语言形式困难。学习者发起的协商只有不足半数能够经历完整的协商互动过程,大部分止于反馈步,少数止于指示步。

关键词: 小组互动, 意义协商, 形式协商, 内容协商

Abstract: This study explores the distribution and processes of negotiated interaction in college English classroom group work under the framework of the model for negotiation, initially proposed by Varonis & Gass (1985). Based on 79 group interactions of topic discussion tasks, randomly extracted from the Spoken English Corpus of Group Interaction in Chinese College English Classrooms, the study fnds that content negotiations take the greatest proportion in group work, helping advance topic development. The EFL learners initiate nearly equal proportions of meaning and form negotiations to resolve communication breakdowns and linguistic troubles. Once initiated, most negotiations are followed by the moves of Response, but less than half fulfill the complete negotiation routine of “Indicator—Response—Reaction to Response”.

中图分类号: 

  • H319.3